logo
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
yuguhun  
#1 Posted : Wednesday, January 13, 2016 8:25:57 AM(UTC)
yuguhun

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 1/7/2016(UTC)
Posts: 798

Weve seen it a million times. Greg Jennings Jersey . A receiver doesnt make the catch on a passing play and instantly motions to the ref – and everybody else – for a pass interference flag. Sometimes he gets the call, more often he doesnt; but if the CFLs new proposed rule change – making pass interference calls reviewable – is passed, hell at least have a chance to be vindicated for his protestation. The league announced it is considering making pass interference, both called and potential, subject to a coachs challenge, with the potential rule change to be voted on by the Rules Committee Thursday. The rule change would lead to a more accurately called game, but is it worth the trouble? Any fan knows that pass interference is questionable on a large number of passing plays, and at breakneck speeds its not always easy to determine. While a video review would likely lead to the correct call, it would also slow down the pace of the game. Its probable each coach could find at least two passing plays – his allotted number of challenges per game – to throw the red flag on per game. And if hes correct in his first two challenges, thats another PI call to contest each game. That time adds up. Making subjective calls reviewable is an issue as well. While fans of the losing team would surely be on board, taking too much power away from the refs is not ideal. Removing a refs judgment and calling pass interference strictly by the book could lead to a lot more infractions, making a defensive backs job even harder. It could open the door to more subjective calls getting the video review treatment as well. If pass interference can be challenged by coaches, why not holding calls, offside calls, or roughing the passer? Thursdays Rules Committee meeting will also see blocking rules reviewed, head shot rules clarified, and changes to scoring rules clarified, but the pass interference proposal is the big one. The Rouge asks: Should the CFL make pass interference subject to video review? Youve heard what weve had to say, now its your turn. As always, its Your! Call. John Sullivan Jersey .C. -- Kemba Walker said the most notable transformation between this years Charlotte Bobcats and teams of the past is now they expect to win games. Charles Johnson Vikings Jersey . The Bulls brought back James on Wednesday with Kirk Hinrich sidelined by a hamstring injury.ROCHESTER, N.Y. -- The Rochester Americans tied Toronto for first place in the American Hockey Leagues North Division with a 2-1 shootout win over the Marlies on Wednesday. Both team have 30 points, although Toronto (14-9-2) has played three fewer games. Johan Larsson and Dan Catenacci scored in the shootout for Rochester (13-11-4), with Catenaccis goal deciding the game in the seventh round. Winnger Carter Ashton, who had a power-play goal for the Marlies at 7:45 of the opening period, also connected in the shootout. Shaun Hill Vikings Jersey. The goal was his fifth of the season. Centre Mike Zigomanis got the equalizer for the Americans with his ninth of the season at 9:52 of the third period. Drew McIntyre made 28 saves for Toronto, while Matt Hackett stopped 19 shots for Rochester. cheap jerseys cheap jerseys cheap nfl jerseys Ray Ban Outlet Michael Kors Outlet Michael Kors Sale Cheap Michael Kors ' ' '
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.