logo
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
hygbio063  
#1 Posted : Tuesday, December 01, 2015 12:43:53 PM(UTC)
hygbio063

Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Joined: 12/1/2015(UTC)
Posts: 7





Internally, the Wildhorse Nike Air Max Femmes Pas Cher upper is almost completely seamless from the midfoot forward – there is just a bit of stitching at the junction of the midfoot and forefoot on each side. The interior lining is a soft, sock-like mesh and seems like it could handle sockless running without too much issue (have not tried this myself yet – too cold up here). One issue I did have Nike Air Max 1 Femmes initially was some friction at the back of the heel associated with heel slippage. I was worried that I might get some blistering, but the problem seemed to resolve itself after a few runs.

You UserPostedImage can see this phenomenon in action in the video below:When Nike released the Peg 31 I had heard from fellow shoe geeks that they made the shoe a bit firmer, particularly under the forefoot. Given my experience with the Peg 29, I couldn’t resist giving them a try – a similar ride with a more stable forefoot might just do the trick. A few weeks ago I headed over to my local running store to try a pair on. They fit well and felt good underfoot, so I brought the Nike Air Max 90 Femmes France m home with me (Disclosure: these shoes were a personal purchase).


Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.