logo
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
panxing18  
#1 Posted : Saturday, December 01, 2018 6:40:26 AM(UTC)
panxing18

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 5/2/2018(UTC)
Posts: 449
Albania
Location: asdqa

(per Mike Fisher) when saying anything slightly positive about the Cowboy http://www.cowboyscheapauthenticstore.com/antwaun-woods-jersey-cheap , I’m going to start this post with some good news.The Cowboys have only been called for 20 accepted penalties on offense this season. On a per-game basis, that ties the Cowboys for the 13th-fewest penalties in the league. Things look even better on defense, where they are tied for the 9th-fewest penalties (15). It wasn’t so long ago that the Cowboys regularly ranked among the most penalized teams in the league, so that’s definitely something to feel good about. Unfortunately, that’s it in terms of good news for today. So now for the bad news.16 of those 20 penalties resulted in a stalled drive, meaning no points were scored on the drive and no first down was achieved after the penalty incurred. So when you see an offensive penalty and automatically believe that drive is dead, that’s because four out of five times it actually is.And that stalled drive percentage of 80% ranks the Cowboys dead last in a league where the average is 56% and the best teams have a rate below 40%. Some will be quick to point out that this is all on the coaching, which would be true if it weren’t for the players committing the penalties. Others will reflexively blame Jerry Jones for this, which would be at least partly true if we were talking about the 1964 University of Arkansas National Championship team for which he played on the offensive line and was a co-captain. And so it is that almost every time the discussion turns to problems the Cowboys have, some intellectual high-flyer will inevitably propose a simple solution to the problem like “Fire Jason Garrett,” which is inevitably followed by “!!!,” because everybody knows that extra exclamation marks automatically validate the preceding message; the exclamation mark has become the selfie of grammar.But like in every other avenue of life, while simple answers are attractive precisely because they are less intellectually demanding, they also almost never work.So let’s study the data a bit further to find out what’s ailing the Cowboys offense, and we’ll start by breaking down the calls that have gone against the Cowboys this year, by player, not including penalties that were declined or offset: The penalties here didn’t just go against some scrubs, they include some of the faces of the franchise: two former number one picks in Smith and Elliott, the quarterback (I put Prescott in here for the three delay-of-game penalties, but the NFL considers these a team penalty and doesn’t assign them to an individual player), a second-round pick in Williams, and in Collins a guy who was almost a first-round pick.Should Garrett bench Prescott for a couple of snaps after every delay-of-game penalty? Tell Tyron Smith to sit in a corner for a drive and reflect on what a bad boy he’s been for that holding penalty? Take away La’el Collins’ helmet after every penalty and tell him to “think about what you’ve done.” How about cutting Ezekiel Elliott to set an example; after all, Jimmy Johnson would have done that, no?The O-line is responsible for 12 of the 20 penalties and 9 of the 16 stalled drives, and while that may be part of the reason why Paul Alexander was fired, that’s not enough to blame the O-line alone for the stalled drives. Or any other player for that matter.Another data point worth looking at is when the penalties happened, on the hypothesis that a penalty on third down will be a lot harder to overcome than a penalty on first down. Here’s the split for the penalties on the 16 stalled drives:1st down: 4 penalties2nd down: 5 penalties3rd down: 7 penaltiesInterestingly, of the four penalties that didn’t result in a stalled drive, three were on 1st down, one on 2nd. That suggests incurring more penalties on later downs was likely detrimental to the Cowboys’ stuffed drive percentage, but it’s probably not enough to explain away the Cowboys’ 80% stuffed drive percentage.On to our next and final data point, in which we look at what the Cowboys did on the play immediately following the penalty. On 14 of the 16 plays, the Cowboys offense had 10 or more yards to go. Here are the details: Two things stand out to me here:Why would you run on any down with 15+ yards to go? I understand the theoretical need to get the run/pass balance right, but when you know your offense has issues when it’s behind the sticks Cheap Ezekiel Elliott Jersey , why call a run that will net you five or six yards when you need 15+? What’s up with the short passes on long downs?The Cowboys chose a pass play on nine of the 14 plays in the chart above. None of them netted more than 13 yards, most were completions well sort of the sticks. It’d be easy to simply blame this on the quarterback and be done with it, but that would be too simple. The issue here is that the Cowboys don’t seem to have any plays that will reliably result in long completions. And that’s on the QB. But it’s also on the receivers. And the O-line. And the playcalling. And the offensive scheme. And on Jerry Jones, because, well, ... because!!! Perhaps the issues after penalties are symptomatic of a more general issue for the Cowboys offense: the inability to generate big plays when they need them.On 2nd or 3rd down with 11+ yards to go, the 2018 Cowboys achieved a 1st down on just four out of 46 plays (8.7%). That 1st-down percentage ranks them 31st in a league that averages 15.7% and where the leading team (Chargers) averages 37%.Which means the inability to convert after a penalty is not an issue specific to penalties, but is merely an indication of a much broader issue in Dallas. The Cowboys are a run-first, ball-control offense. As such, the entire offense is predicated on “staying on schedule” with a high percentage of runs and a lot of short passes on first and second down that are designed to get the team into manageable third-down situations. That methodical approach to moving the chains is only occasionally interspersed with a play designed to gain big yardage. In 2016, that worked perfectly. The Cowboys stormed to a 13-3 record by staying on schedule: No team ran the ball on a higher percentage of first-down plays than the Cowboys, who did it on 59.8% of all first downs. Ezekiel Elliott led the league in first-down rushes with 204, averaging 5.5 yards a pop en route to establishing one of the most efficient offenses in the league that year. The Cowboys averaged 6.84 yards-to-go on third down, the sixth-best value in the league; Dak Prescott had the sixth-best completion percentage in the NFL on third downs (65.1%) and the sixth-best passer rating. All of this resulted in an offense that ranked fourth overall with 2.54 points scored per drive.The problem is that a penalty (or any other play that results in a loss of yardage), short-circuits that entire offensive plan. Suddenly the offense is derailed and no longer “on schedule”. And when that happens, teams usually thumb through their playbook until they reach the ‘big-play section.’ Unfortunately for the Cowboys, most of the pages in the big-play section are either blank or filled with plays the team can’t properly execute.Which is why in 2018, the offense isn’t working anymore. The Cowboys are still running the ball a lot on first down (ranked fourth with 58.4% of runs on first down), and Ezekiel Elliott still runs a lot on first down (ranked fourth with 83 runs) averaging an impressive 5.7 yards. But the Cowboys are now facing 7.38 yards-to-go on third down, which ranks them 22nd in the league. And partly as a result, Dak Prescott’s completion percentage on third downs has regressed to 58.9% and his passer rating on third downs is a subterranean 77.1. All of which results in an offense that ranks just 19th with 1.93 points per drive. Perhaps the coaching change at O-line will improve an O-line that has allowed 23 sacks (ranked 24th). Perhaps the addition of Amari Cooper will improve a receiving corps that has accumulated just 595 yards after catch (ranked 31st).Perhaps Dak Prescott will continue to play as efficiently as he has in the last four games (96.5 passer rating) after his bumbling start to the season (74.5 passer rating in first three games).Perhaps the Cowboys will trade for a TE. Perhaps the coaching staff has used the bye week to fill the blank pages in the big play section of the playbook with “cool” plays the players can actually execute effectively.Perhaps, perhaps, perhaps.In the end, the Cowboys of the first seven weeks weren’t able to convert enough plays with 11+ yards to go. Their current 1st-down percentage of 8.7% pales against the 17.2% they achieved in 2016. Penalties are not derailing the 2018 offense. But the failure to execute their offensive scheme is. Fix that and things could be looking up again.Crunching stats: The numbers say the Cowboys-Texans game wasn’t nearly as close as the score Sometimes after a loss, a look at the stats can bring up some bright spots, things to build on going forward. But if you are looking for those about the Dallas Cowboys in their overtime loss to the Houston Texans, well, too bad. The score says it was close. The numbers say that Dallas was roundly and soundly beaten.Here’s a dig into the stats to show you what I mean.170 total yards differentialThat’s how much the Texans out-gained the Cowboys by, 462 to 292. To put it in a little more perspective, Houston gained 158% of the yards Dallas did. And it was almost all in the passing game. Dak Prescott put up another clunker, only throwing for a net of 194, while Deshaun Watson was putting up 374. In terms of yards gained per offensive snap, the edge went to the Texans 6.1 to 4.9. Their offensive domination is starkly clear.Had it not been for Bill O’Brien making a couple of decisions that rivaled Jason Garrett’s failure to go for it in overtime, plus some clutch defensive plays at crucial moments Youth Maliek Collins Jersey , this could easily have been a two score defeat or worse for the Cowboys. 25 to 14This is the first downs, which is right in line with the total yards. Breaking those down, while Dallas had six rushing and eight passing, Houston was predominately doing things the way most NFL teams do it in the 21st century, gaining 18 first downs through the air. Oh, and just to help them along, Dallas gifted them three first downs through penalties. 20 for 54As in carries and yards gained for Ezekiel Elliott, for a paltry 2.7 yards per carry. The Texans came in with a plan to take the ground game away and then attack Prescott when he dropped back to pass, and it worked almost perfectly. Jason Garrett and Scott Linehan still believe that they can succeed with a run-oriented attack. That is partly driven by the limitations that the passing game has. But if an opponent can slow Elliott down the way Houston did, then this is the kind of game you can expect. Making things worse, there may not be a way to fix this before the season is over. They have to roll with Prescott, and there isn’t any help at receiver coming, either. Depressing, isn’t it?10 quarterback hitsThat’s a lot of blows to the passer. But it’s not how many time Prescott was knocked down. It is how many times Watson was, usually as he was completing another pass for a first down, or at least it seemed. The problem is that the Cowboys could not turn those into sacks (they were credited with one on the play where Jaylon Smith, one of the few standouts for the Cowboys, stopped Watson on fourth and goal). Watson didn’t have a lot of time back there and was under some pretty constant pressure himself. He was just able to overcome it to keep his team alive far more often. He had a 75% completion rate compared to Prescott’s 62%, The pressure got to Dak, but Deshaun largely shrugged it off.One bit of praise for a member of the Cowboys here. DT Daniel Ross was credited with half the hits on Watson. He has been doing a great job, but the rushmen as a whole have to do much better. One of the great frustrations for us is how suspect offensive lines always seem to find a way to play like a bunch of Pro Bowlers when they line up against Dallas.4 of 14 (29%)Another bad third-down efficiency for Dallas, which continues the dismal trend that has plagued them all season. They did manage to score a touchdown on their two trips to the red zone, but the fact it was only two trips was the real problem. 6 for 16Here are the completions and targets for all wide receivers. It is simply pitiful. The blame is on just about everyone, the quarterback who had too many off-target throws, the receivers who dropped too many chances when the ball did get to them, and Linehan, who didn’t have a way to get more out of his admittedly limited weapons. While we’re at it, let’s also dump a bit on the GM and the members of his staff who came up with this wide receiver by committee mess. The committee is obviously way too light on talent and ability.25As noted, there just isn’t much good for Dallas this game, but just to offer a faint ray of hope, that is the combined tackles by Leighton Vander Esch and Jaylon Smith. With Sean Lee out, they have proven that they are more than able to step up and carry the load.But the overall picture is grim. The combination of stats makes it clear that the final score of the game was deceptive. It wasn’t really that close. The Cowboys had no right to even get it to overtime. Unless they can come up with some answers fast, this season is going to go downhill in a hurry.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.